Separating fact from fiction to make self-hypnosis more effective in everyday life.
“The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance—it is the illusion of knowledge.”
— Daniel J. Boorstin
If I had a pound for every time someone has said to me, “I don’t think I can be hypnotised,” or “Isn’t self-hypnosis just meditation?” or “Won’t I lose control?“, I’d have enough money to carry on buying even more vintage hypnosis books and extravagant psychology books. Which, if you know me at all, is a compulsive habit I already have.
Despite decades of scientific research and a substantial body of clinical literature, self-hypnosis continues to be surrounded by myths. Some have been inherited from stage hypnosis. Others have been fuelled by films and television. A surprising number have even found their way into books and sadly many get perpetuated on training courses.
The result is unfortunate. People often approach self-hypnosis with misconceptions that limit how effectively they engage with it. Sometimes they expect miracles. Sometimes they dismiss it entirely. Neither position reflects what the science actually tells us.
One of the most interesting findings to emerge from recent reviews of the literature — including work I have published with Dr Ben Parris — is that self-hypnosis is both more practical and more psychologically sophisticated than many people imagine. Rather than being an unusual altered state that occasionally happens to a fortunate few, self-hypnosis appears to involve a range of attentional, cognitive and motivational processes that can be deliberately cultivated and integrated into daily life. You can read this article on how to apply self-hypnosis in daily life for more on that topic.
Ironically, understanding what self-hypnosis is not often helps us understand what it is. That understanding can make a meaningful difference to how effectively it is used.
Let’s explore some of the biggest myths.
Myth 1: Self-Hypnosis Means Putting Yourself Into A Trance
This may be the most widespread misunderstanding of all.
Ask most people what self-hypnosis involves and they’ll describe “going into a trance.” It sounds mysterious. It sounds dramatic. Unfortunately, it isn’t particularly helpful. (I actually recorded a video a number of years ago entitled Is It Time We Stopped Using the Word Trance here if you wish to explore the topic further)
The scientific literature has never reached universal agreement on precisely what hypnosis is. There are state theories, sociocognitive theories, integrative models and predictive processing accounts. Researchers continue to debate mechanisms.
What there is much greater agreement about is that hypnosis involves focused attention, absorbed engagement, expectation, imagination and responsiveness to suggestion.
Notice what isn’t necessarily required.
A mysterious trance.
In our own published review of the clinical applications of self-hypnosis, Ben Parris and I (2018) found remarkably little consistency across studies regarding what researchers even meant by “trance.” Many successful interventions simply taught participants to focus attention, regulate awareness and engage actively with therapeutic suggestions.
That observation mirrors what many experienced clinicians have seen for years.
Some people experience profound relaxation.
Some do not.
Some report feeling wonderfully different.
Others feel almost entirely normal.
Both groups may respond extremely well.
If you spend your self-hypnosis session constantly wondering whether you’ve “gone deep enough,” you’re directing attention towards evaluating your experience instead of engaging with it.
That is rather like lifting the lid every two minutes to see whether the cake is baking properly.
The depth of your subjective experience is often far less important than the quality of your psychological engagement.
Myth 2: Self-Hypnosis Is Simply Deep Relaxation
Relaxation certainly has value.
Many people first encounter hypnosis while lying comfortably in bed using Hypnosis Audios (click there to check out my own selection of these), listening to a soothing voice encouraging slow breathing and muscular relaxation. There is nothing wrong with that.
The problem begins when relaxation becomes confused with hypnosis itself.
Scientific research consistently demonstrates that hypnosis and relaxation are related but separate phenomena.
People can experience hypnosis with minimal or zero relaxation.
Equally, someone may become deeply relaxed without engaging in hypnosis at all.
This distinction matters.
Some of the most effective modern applications of self-hypnosis occur whilst people are physically active. As you will have seen if you are a regular reader of my articles or watched my recent videos.
Athletes use hypnotic methods immediately before competition.
Patients use self-hypnosis whilst undergoing medical procedures.
Individuals living with chronic pain employ hypnotic attentional strategies during ordinary daily activities.
Students use self-hypnosis before examinations.
Public speakers use it moments before walking onto stage.
None of these situations necessarily involves lying motionless on a sofa.
One of the ideas I have tried to promote for many years is active-alert self-hypnosis.My students learn this, my clinical clients learn this.
Rather than slowing everything down, active-alert methods deliberately harness movement, posture, breathing, attentional control and cognitive direction whilst remaining fully engaged with the environment.
That makes self-hypnosis considerably easier to integrate into everyday life.
You needn’t disappear into a darkened room for forty minutes.
Sometimes two focused minutes whilst waiting outside a meeting are entirely sufficient.
Myth 3: You Lose Control During Self-Hypnosis
This myth has remarkable staying power.
Hollywood certainly hasn’t helped.
The fictional hypnotist clicks their fingers.
The victim becomes helpless.
Secrets are revealed.
Bank vaults are emptied.
Apparently everyone develops an irresistible urge to cluck like a chicken (I’ve never seen any stage hypnotists do this tbh!).
Reality is considerably less entertaining.
One of the defining characteristics of self-hypnosis is that you are directing the process.
You choose your goal.
You formulate your suggestions.
You determine whether to continue.
You can stop at any moment.
Research into hypnosis repeatedly demonstrates that participants remain aware of their surroundings and retain the capacity to reject suggestions that conflict with their values or intentions.
This is even more obviously true in self-hypnosis because there isn’t another person attempting to influence you.
The process depends upon cooperation rather than surrender.
Indeed, I often tell clients that successful self-hypnosis requires more active participation, not less.
You are deliberately directing attention.
You are engaging imagination.
You are rehearsing behaviours.
You are strengthening particular cognitive and emotional responses.
That requires skill.
Not passivity.
Myth 4: Self-Hypnosis Is Just Positive Thinking
Positive thinking has enjoyed a long and rather colourful history.
Unfortunately, so has oversimplification.
Self-hypnosis is not simply repeating cheerful affirmations whilst hoping for the best.
Research suggests that suggestions work most effectively when they align with believable expectations, meaningful goals and psychologically plausible change.
Imagine someone who experiences severe social anxiety repeatedly saying:
“I am the most confident person in Britain.”
Their brain may politely decline the invitation.
Suggestions tend to become more effective when they work with existing psychological processes rather than attempting to bulldoze them.
Compare that with:
“Each conversation gives me another opportunity to become slightly more comfortable.”
That suggestion allows progress.
It creates movement.
It feels achievable.
Modern cognitive psychology has repeatedly shown that expectations influence perception, attention and behaviour. Hypnotic suggestions appear to capitalise upon those mechanisms rather than replacing them with magical thinking.
Good self-hypnosis therefore resembles carefully designed psychological training. You adopt a hypnotic mindset which is a fostering of expectation, adoption of the role, belief in the suggests and a seeming creation of one’s perceived reality.
It is purposeful.
Specific.
Incremental.
Grounded in behaviour.
Myth 5: Self-Hypnosis Only Works For Highly Suggestible People
This misconception discourages countless people before they even begin.
“I don’t think I’m suggestible.”
“I’ve got too analytical a mind.”
“My brain won’t switch off.”
I’ve heard all of them.
Interestingly, the evidence paints a more nuanced picture.
Yes, hypnotic responsiveness varies between individuals.
That has been demonstrated consistently across decades of research.
However, responsiveness is not simply an all-or-nothing personality trait.
It appears to involve motivation, expectations, context, learning, attentional ability and the particular outcome being measured.
Furthermore, different applications of hypnosis appear to rely upon somewhat different psychological mechanisms.
Someone who responds only moderately on a laboratory hypnotisability scale may nevertheless derive considerable benefit from self-hypnosis for stress management, sleep improvement, confidence building or pain management.
Practice also matters.
Like mindfulness.
Like visualisation.
Like learning a musical instrument.
Skill develops.
One reason I encourage people to use self-hypnosis regularly is that they become increasingly familiar with directing their own attention. They learn how to notice distractions without following them. They become more skilled at generating vivid imagery. Their confidence grows.
Those improvements often enhance effectiveness over time.
This is one reason I believe the phrase practising self-hypnosis is more accurate than doing self-hypnosis.
Practice implies development.
Development reflects what the science increasingly suggests.
Why These Myths Matter
Some of you may (understandably) wonder whether any of this really matters.
After all, if someone benefits from self-hypnosis despite misunderstanding it, isn’t that enough?
Perhaps.
But misconceptions can become self-fulfilling.
Someone expecting to experience an extraordinary altered state may conclude they have “failed” because they simply felt calm and focused.
Someone convinced they must become completely relaxed may abandon perfectly effective active-alert approaches.
Someone expecting instant transformation may overlook the gradual behavioural changes that genuinely predict lasting success.
Expectation influences outcome.
Psychology has demonstrated that repeatedly.
Ironically, one of the most effective ways to improve self-hypnosis may be to remove unrealistic expectations altogether.
Instead of asking:
“Am I hypnotised yet?”
A more useful question becomes:
“Am I fully engaging with the process?”
Those are two very different questions.
Only one reliably improves performance.
… and by the way… if you want to learn my official, structured approach to self-hypnosis, visit this page of my college website: Learn Self-Hypnosis Here.
Myth 6: Self-Hypnosis Is Just Another Name for Meditation
This comparison crops up remarkably often.
It usually comes from a good place. Both practices involve directing attention. Both can improve wellbeing. Both can be practised independently. Both have substantial scientific literatures.
So surely they’re essentially the same thing?
Not quite.
There is certainly overlap. Both self-hypnosis and many forms of meditation encourage attentional control, awareness of internal experience and a reduction in habitual, automatic responding. They can both influence emotional regulation, stress and cognitive flexibility.
However, the similarities shouldn’t obscure some important differences.
Many meditation traditions encourage observation without attempting to change experience. If an anxious thought appears, for example, the practitioner may simply notice it, acknowledge it and allow it to pass without judgement.
Self-hypnosis usually has a different objective.
Rather than merely observing mental events, it actively seeks to influence them.
Suggestions are introduced deliberately.
Mental imagery is used purposefully.
Future behaviour is rehearsed.
Attention is directed towards particular psychological outcomes.
In that sense, self-hypnosis resembles mental skills training as much as contemplative practice.
Neither approach is inherently better.
They’re simply doing different jobs.
In fact, I often encourage people to use both.
Mindfulness may help someone become aware of an unhelpful habit.
Self-hypnosis can then help rehearse replacing that habit with a more useful one.
Meditation cultivates awareness.
Self-hypnosis often cultivates change.
The two can complement each other rather beautifully.
Myth 7: Self-Hypnosis Can Make You Believe Things That Aren’t True
This myth deserves careful attention.
Partly because it worries people.
Partly because it touches upon one of the most misunderstood aspects of hypnosis research.
Hypnosis can influence perception.
It can alter pain.
It can affect attention.
It can modify expectations.
That much is well supported.
What it cannot reliably do is override reality in the simplistic way often portrayed in popular culture.
Sometimes people assume hypnotic suggestion operates like installing new software into the brain.
Unfortunately, our minds are rather more sophisticated than that.
Suggestions are interpreted through existing beliefs, memories, motivations and expectations.
They don’t bypass them.
This becomes particularly important when discussing memory.
For many years hypnosis acquired an unfortunate reputation because some practitioners attempted to recover supposedly forgotten memories using hypnotic procedures.
Research has repeatedly demonstrated that hypnosis does not function as a reliable memory recovery tool.
In fact, hypnotic procedures may increase confidence in memories without necessarily increasing their accuracy.
That distinction is critically important.
Confidence is not the same thing as truth.
For precisely this reason, responsible professional organisations caution strongly against using hypnosis as a means of uncovering supposedly hidden memories.
The evidence simply does not support such practices.
Ironically, understanding these limitations should increase rather than diminish confidence in evidence-based self-hypnosis.
It reminds us that hypnosis works through understandable psychological mechanisms rather than mysterious mental powers.
Myth 8: There Isn’t Much Scientific Evidence for Self-Hypnosis
This statement was perhaps easier to make thirty years ago.
Today, it simply doesn’t reflect the literature.
The scientific evidence surrounding hypnosis has expanded enormously.
Self-hypnosis research has also grown steadily, although not as quickly as research into therapist-led hypnosis.
In our own systematic review of the clinical applications of self-hypnosis, Ben Parris and I examined studies investigating self-hypnosis across a range of clinical settings.
One of the striking observations was the sheer diversity of applications.
Researchers have investigated self-hypnosis in relation to chronic pain, procedural pain, anxiety, stress, sleep, childbirth, cancer care, irritable bowel syndrome, rehabilitation, emotional wellbeing and numerous other healthcare contexts.
The quality of the evidence varies.
As with almost every area of psychological science, some studies are stronger than others.
Sample sizes differ.
Methods differ.
Training procedures differ.
Definitions differ.
Nevertheless, the overall picture is encouraging.
Rather than asking whether self-hypnosis “works”, researchers are increasingly asking how, when and for whom it works best.
That is precisely the sort of question mature scientific disciplines begin asking once the basic phenomenon has become reasonably well established.
It is also worth remembering that hypnosis research has benefited enormously from advances in cognitive neuroscience over the past two decades.
Brain imaging studies have demonstrated measurable changes associated with hypnotic responding.
These findings don’t prove every claim ever made about hypnosis.
Far from it.
What they do demonstrate is that hypnotic suggestion produces observable alterations in brain function consistent with changes in attention, perception and cognitive control.
That makes hypnosis considerably less mysterious than many people suppose.
Myth 9: Self-Hypnosis Is Only Useful for Relaxation
If relaxation were the only benefit, that would already be worthwhile.
Modern life provides no shortage of stress.
However, restricting self-hypnosis to relaxation is rather like buying a Swiss Army knife and using only the toothpick.
Research suggests applications extending far beyond calming down.
Clinical psychologists and healthcare professionals have investigated hypnotic approaches for managing chronic pain, reducing procedural discomfort, improving sleep, supporting rehabilitation, reducing anxiety before surgery and helping people cope with long-term medical conditions.
Sports psychologists have explored performance enhancement, concentration, confidence and recovery.
Educational psychologists have investigated learning and examination performance.
Health psychologists have examined behaviour change relating to smoking cessation, physical activity and weight management.
Of course, evidence varies between applications.
Some areas have accumulated substantial support.
Others require considerably more research.
Responsible practitioners should always distinguish between well-supported applications and those where evidence remains preliminary.
Nevertheless, the breadth of investigation demonstrates an important point.
Self-hypnosis is fundamentally a psychological skill.
Like visualisation.
Like attentional control.
Like cognitive restructuring.
Once viewed in those terms, its potential applications become much easier to understand.
Any situation involving thoughts, emotions, expectations, behaviour or perception may potentially benefit from appropriately designed hypnotic interventions.
That is an extraordinarily wide canvas.
Myth 10: You Have to Find Thirty Quiet Minutes Every Day
This myth quietly discourages many people from ever establishing a regular practice.
Life is busy.
Children interrupt.
Phones ring.
Meetings start.
Dogs decide the postman is an existential threat.
Waiting for perfect conditions often means waiting forever.
One of the most important developments in my own understanding of self-hypnosis has been recognising how effectively it can be woven into ordinary daily routines.
It doesn’t always require a formal session.
Consider the runner standing at the start line.
The executive waiting outside the boardroom.
The student sitting quietly before opening an examination paper.
The patient preparing for a medical procedure.
The golfer standing over a crucial putt.
None of these individuals has twenty uninterrupted minutes available.
Yet each can deliberately regulate attention, influence expectation, rehearse successful performance and engage constructive suggestion.
That is self-hypnosis in action.
The more frequently these skills are practised within everyday situations, the more naturally they become integrated into ordinary behaviour.
This idea aligns closely with what Ben Parris and I have described as viewing self-hypnosis as a flexible collection of psychological processes rather than a rigid ritual requiring a particular environment or induction procedure.
Ironically, abandoning rigid rules often makes people more likely to practise consistently.
And consistency usually beats intensity.
A Better Way of Thinking About Self-Hypnosis
After reviewing hundreds of research papers over the years, my own perspective has shifted considerably.
I no longer think of self-hypnosis primarily as entering a particular state.
I think of it as learning to use your own psychology more skilfully.
That includes learning to:
Direct attention intentionally.
Engage imagination constructively.
Influence expectations realistically.
Rehearse future behaviour.
Strengthen emotional regulation.
Increase psychological flexibility.
Support healthier habits.
Improve consistency between intentions and actions.
Seen through that lens, self-hypnosis becomes much less mysterious.
It also becomes far more useful.
Perhaps most importantly, it becomes something you can employ repeatedly throughout an ordinary Tuesday rather than reserving for occasional special moments.
Psychology is something we are doing all day, every day.
Self-hypnosis simply provides a structured way of doing it rather better.
Getting the Most from Self-Hypnosis: Nine Evidence-Informed Principles
If there is one lesson that emerges repeatedly from the scientific literature, it is this:
Understanding self-hypnosis properly often makes it work better.
That shouldn’t surprise us.
Every psychological skill benefits from being practised in the way it was designed to work. Nobody expects to become proficient at playing the piano after reading a single book. Likewise, nobody assumes that going for one jog will prepare them for a marathon.
Self-hypnosis is no different.
It is a learnable psychological skill. Like any skill, it improves through understanding, deliberate practice and thoughtful refinement.
The following principles are drawn from the contemporary research literature, clinical practice and the conclusions Ben Parris and I reached when reviewing the scientific evidence surrounding self-hypnosis.
1. Stop Chasing “Deep Hypnosis”
One of the most liberating discoveries people make is that they don’t need to feel profoundly different for self-hypnosis to be effective.
Many beginners become trapped in an internal commentary:
“Am I hypnotised yet?”
“I still know where I am.”
“I can still hear traffic outside.”
“Perhaps this isn’t working.”
Ironically, these constant evaluations pull attention away from the very processes that matter.
Research suggests that hypnotic responding depends less upon achieving a mysterious state and more upon engaging with suggestions, directing attention and allowing imagination to become meaningful.
Instead of measuring success by how unusual you feel, measure it by how completely you participate.
Did you engage?
Did you imagine?
Did you rehearse?
Did you focus?
Those questions are far more useful.
2. Give Your Mind Something Specific to Do
The brain responds remarkably well to clarity.
Compare these two intentions:
“I want to feel better.”
“Tomorrow morning, when I walk into the meeting, I’ll notice my shoulders relaxing, breathe steadily and begin speaking calmly.”
Which gives your mind more to work with?
Specific suggestions create clearer psychological targets.
This aligns with decades of research on goal-setting and mental rehearsal.
The more vividly the desired behaviour is represented, the easier it becomes to reproduce.
Vague aspirations rarely generate consistent behavioural change.
Specific behavioural rehearsals often do.
3. Work With Your Psychology, Not Against It
One of the biggest mistakes people make is trying to force themselves into believing something they simply don’t accept.
Suggestions become more persuasive when they feel psychologically credible.
If someone has struggled with sleep for years, repeatedly insisting,
“I fall asleep instantly every night,”
may simply create internal resistance.
A more helpful suggestion might be:
“Each evening I become a little more skilled at allowing sleep to arrive naturally.”
Notice the difference?
One demands immediate transformation.
The other encourages gradual learning.
Our minds tend to cooperate much more willingly with progress than perfection.
4. Make Mental Imagery Rich and Meaningful
Mental imagery has long occupied an important place within hypnosis research.
The brain often responds surprisingly well to vividly imagined experiences.
Elite athletes have understood this for decades.
So have musicians.
Pilots.
Surgeons.
The imagery doesn’t need to resemble a Hollywood film.
It simply needs to become meaningful.
Notice the sounds.
The movement.
The physical sensations.
The emotional tone.
The more fully you involve your imagination, the more effectively your brain can rehearse the experience.
Self-hypnosis provides an ideal framework for that rehearsal.
5. Practise Little and Often
People frequently ask me how long they should practise self-hypnosis.
They’re sometimes disappointed by my answer.
Usually, less than they expect.
Consistency almost always beats duration.
Five minutes every day will often produce more meaningful change than one elaborate session every fortnight.
Psychological habits develop through repetition.
Neural pathways strengthen through repeated activation.
Confidence grows through familiarity.
That is one reason I encourage people to think of self-hypnosis as part of everyday psychological hygiene.
We brush our teeth daily.
We don’t wait until every third Sunday and brush them for two hours.
Our minds deserve similar consistency.
6. Expect Improvement Rather Than Perfection
Modern psychology increasingly recognises that expectations influence experience.
This doesn’t mean wishful thinking changes reality.
It means our expectations shape attention, motivation, interpretation and behaviour.
Healthy expectations therefore become valuable allies.
Expect improvement.
Expect practice.
Expect occasional setbacks.
Expect learning.
These expectations create resilience.
Expecting instant transformation often creates disappointment instead.
7. Use Self-Hypnosis Where It Matters Most
Many people separate self-hypnosis from real life.
They practise in one room.
Life happens elsewhere.
A more productive approach is to bring psychological skills into the situations where they’re genuinely needed.
Waiting before an interview.
Standing on a golf tee.
Preparing to deliver a presentation.
Sitting in the dentist’s waiting room.
Walking towards a difficult conversation.
Those moments offer ideal opportunities for brief, focused self-hypnotic interventions.
The more closely practice resembles real life, the more readily those skills transfer.
Psychologists sometimes refer to this as improving transfer of learning.
The principle is simple.
Practise where performance matters.
8. Stay Curious About Your Own Mind
Curiosity is an underrated therapeutic skill.
Instead of constantly judging whether today’s session was “good” or “bad”, become interested.
What helped concentration?
Which suggestions felt natural?
What distracted you?
When did imagery become most vivid?
Curiosity replaces criticism with learning.
That simple shift often accelerates progress.
It also reflects one of psychology’s most valuable habits: observing experience before rushing to evaluate it.
9. Remember That Self-Hypnosis Supports Change – It Doesn’t Replace Action
This may be the most important principle of all.
Self-hypnosis is not a substitute for behaviour.
It is a way of supporting behaviour.
If your goal is improved fitness, eventually you’ll need to exercise.
If your goal is better communication, you’ll need conversations.
If your goal is greater confidence, you’ll need experiences that allow confidence to develop.
Self-hypnosis helps prepare the mind for those behaviours.
It strengthens intention.
It rehearses success.
It reduces unnecessary interference.
But it still asks something of you afterwards.
I rather like thinking of self-hypnosis as a psychological catalyst.
A catalyst speeds up a reaction.
It doesn’t replace the ingredients.
Why Accurate Understanding Improves Results
One conclusion becomes increasingly difficult to ignore after spending years reading hypnosis research.
The myths surrounding self-hypnosis don’t merely create confusion.
They can actively reduce effectiveness.
Someone who believes they must become unconscious may never notice genuine progress.
Someone convinced they need forty uninterrupted minutes may never practise at all.
Someone waiting for a dramatic “trance feeling” may overlook meaningful improvements in attention, emotional regulation or behaviour.
Perhaps the greatest gift science has given hypnosis is not making it more mysterious.
It has made it more understandable.
And that understanding allows us to use it more intelligently.
The modern scientific view encourages us to think less about surrendering control and more about developing it.
Less about escaping consciousness and more about directing it.
Less about extraordinary experiences and more about ordinary psychological skills used extraordinarily well.
That, I believe, is a far more empowering way to think about self-hypnosis.
The Bottom Line: Self-Hypnosis Deserves Better Than Its Myths
“The map is not the territory.”
— Alfred Korzybski
Perhaps that quotation captures the central message of this article better just as well as any other.
For generations, self-hypnosis has been described through maps that are incomplete, outdated or simply inaccurate. Popular culture has often portrayed it as mysterious. Stage performances have sometimes made it appear theatrical. Well-intentioned enthusiasts have occasionally presented it as a cure-all. Predictably, sceptics have responded by dismissing it altogether.
Neither extreme reflects the science.
The evidence accumulated over many decades paints a far more interesting picture. Self-hypnosis is neither magic nor myth. It is neither mind control nor mere relaxation. It is not about surrendering your will, switching off your brain or drifting into some exotic altered state from which only a hypnotist can rescue you.
Rather, self-hypnosis is best understood as a structured method of using normal psychological processes with greater intention.
It allows us to direct attention more skilfully.
To engage our imagination more constructively.
To shape expectations more helpfully.
To rehearse adaptive behaviours before we need them.
To regulate emotional responses with greater flexibility.
And, perhaps most importantly, to become a more active participant in our own psychological wellbeing.
That may sound rather less dramatic than some of the myths. Personally, I think it is considerably more exciting.
One of the most encouraging developments in recent years has been the growing recognition that self-hypnosis need not be confined to therapy rooms or occasional formal practice sessions. It can become woven into everyday life.
A few moments before delivering a presentation.
The quiet pause before speaking with someone about a difficult issue.
Preparing for a sporting challenge.
Settling your mind before sleep.
Managing discomfort during a medical procedure.
Regaining perspective during a stressful day.
These are precisely the sorts of situations in which self-hypnosis can become a practical psychological skill rather than an abstract concept.
Like any worthwhile skill, however, it improves through practice.
You are unlikely to master a musical instrument after one lesson. Equally, you shouldn’t expect to become an expert in self-hypnosis after a single session. The real benefits tend to emerge gradually, through repetition, curiosity and refinement.
There is another important point worth remembering.
Self-hypnosis is not something that happens to you.
It is something you actively do.
That shift in perspective changes almost everything.
Instead of waiting for hypnosis to occur, you begin developing the psychological skills that make hypnotic responding increasingly natural. You become less concerned with chasing unusual experiences and more interested in cultivating useful ones. The emphasis moves from passive expectation to active engagement.
For me, that represents one of the most significant shifts in contemporary hypnosis research.
The question is no longer, “Can I enter a hypnotic trance?”
A much more useful question is:
“How can I use my own psychology more effectively?”
Self-hypnosis offers one evidence-informed answer to that question.
It is not the only answer, of course. Psychology provides us with many valuable approaches, from mindfulness and cognitive behavioural techniques to mental rehearsal, implementation intentions and acceptance-based strategies. Self-hypnosis sits comfortably alongside these approaches, drawing upon many of the same cognitive and attentional processes whilst offering its own distinctive methods for facilitating change.
Ultimately, the myths surrounding self-hypnosis tell us far less about hypnosis than they do about our tendency to prefer simple stories over nuanced evidence.
Science rarely deals in absolutes.
It refines.
It questions.
It updates.
It asks better questions as new evidence emerges.
Self-hypnosis deserves to be viewed in exactly that spirit.
Not as something mysterious to believe in.
Not as something to dismiss because of outdated misconceptions.
But as a fascinating, evolving and increasingly well-understood psychological skill that, when applied thoughtfully and consistently, can help us think more clearly, respond more adaptively and live rather more intentionally.
And, in my view, that’s considerably more impressive than any myth.
Have some of themes about self-hypnosis resonated with you? Then have a read of these pages:
Would you like a satisfying and meaningful career as a hypnotherapist helping others? Are you a hypnotherapist looking for stimulating and career enhancing continued professional development and advanced studies? Adam Eason’s Anglo European training college.
References:
Alladin, A. (2018). Cognitive hypnotherapy: An integrated approach to the treatment of emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Wiley.
American Psychological Association, Division 30. (2015). Definition and description of hypnosis. American Psychological Association.
Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., Christensen, C., French, C. C., Lynn, S. J., Montgomery, G. H., & Spiegel, D. (2020). Hypnosis. In APA handbook of clinical psychology.
Eason, A. (2013). The science of self-hypnosis: The evidence-based way to hypnotise yourself. Awake Media Productions.
Eason, A. D., & Parris, B. A. (2024). The importance of highlighting the role of the self in hypnotherapy and hypnosis.Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101810.
Eason, A. D., & Parris, B. A. (2019). Clinical applications of self-hypnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000173
Elkins, G. R. (2017). Handbook of medical and psychological hypnosis: Foundations, applications, and professional issues. Springer.
Jensen, M. P. (2011). Hypnosis for chronic pain management: Therapist guide. Oxford University Press.
Kirsch, I., Capafons, A., Cardeña, E., & Amigó, S. (Eds.). (1999). Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioural perspectives. American Psychological Association.
Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., & Hallquist, M. N. (2008). Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 111–139). Oxford University Press.
Montgomery, G. H., Schnur, J. B., & Kravits, K. (2013). Hypnosis for cancer care: Over 200 years young. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 63(1), 31–44.
Nash, M. R., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice. Oxford University Press.
Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: Opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 565–576.
Spiegel, D., & Spiegel, H. (2004). Trance and treatment: Clinical uses of hypnosis (2nd ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 59–74.
Yapko, M. D. (2018). Trancework: An introduction to the practice of clinical hypnosis (5th ed.). Routledge.
