<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are Hypnosis And Relaxation Different Flavours Of The Same Thing?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://adam-eason.com/are-hypnosis-and-relaxation-different-flavours-of-the-same-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://adam-eason.com/are-hypnosis-and-relaxation-different-flavours-of-the-same-thing/</link>
	<description>Hypnosis, Hypnotherapy and Cognitive Behavioural Hypnotherpy as taught by Hypnotherapist Adam Eason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Williams		</title>
		<link>https://adam-eason.com/are-hypnosis-and-relaxation-different-flavours-of-the-same-thing/#comment-26911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam-eason.com/?p=4306#comment-26911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure, Eason. I&#039;ve read Edmonston, and his thesis that hypnotic relaxation (which he calls anesis, an attempt to distinguish it from Don Gibbons&#039;s alert hypnosis, or hyperempiria) is essentially identical, certainly in physiological metrics, with &#039;just relaxing&#039;, is pretty compelling. His original work is now more than thirty years old, but that doesn&#039;t mean out of date, as you know.

It&#039;s all beginning to sound like this: Relax, using verbal (or any other, such as somatic) suggestions, then introduce suggestions for whatever effect you want to produce.

Edmonston&#039;s stuff is particularly valuable, though, in reintroducing notions entertained even by Braid, viz. that it might be useful to view &#039;hypnotic work&#039; as two separable exercises, with different intentions: (1) as a strategy for creating &#039;neutral hypnosis&#039; - deep,physiological relaxation, with no other object; (2) as an exercise in creating a state of mind (absorption, disocciation, etc.) that facilitates suggestions for habit-change, skill-enhancement, and so on.

Continuing research will throw light on the fantastically thorny subject of hypnosis, of course, but I admire your scholarship and your open-mindedness about the whole thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure, Eason. I&#8217;ve read Edmonston, and his thesis that hypnotic relaxation (which he calls anesis, an attempt to distinguish it from Don Gibbons&#8217;s alert hypnosis, or hyperempiria) is essentially identical, certainly in physiological metrics, with &#8216;just relaxing&#8217;, is pretty compelling. His original work is now more than thirty years old, but that doesn&#8217;t mean out of date, as you know.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all beginning to sound like this: Relax, using verbal (or any other, such as somatic) suggestions, then introduce suggestions for whatever effect you want to produce.</p>
<p>Edmonston&#8217;s stuff is particularly valuable, though, in reintroducing notions entertained even by Braid, viz. that it might be useful to view &#8216;hypnotic work&#8217; as two separable exercises, with different intentions: (1) as a strategy for creating &#8216;neutral hypnosis&#8217; &#8211; deep,physiological relaxation, with no other object; (2) as an exercise in creating a state of mind (absorption, disocciation, etc.) that facilitates suggestions for habit-change, skill-enhancement, and so on.</p>
<p>Continuing research will throw light on the fantastically thorny subject of hypnosis, of course, but I admire your scholarship and your open-mindedness about the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
